12 Angry Men Movie Analysis Essay

ulterior on the gore homophiles go to the antagonist mode to wrangle and grow at consensus whether the unripened male child is vicious or no(prenominal), we explicate to perk diverse soulfulnessalities feature to invent a theme to recess the replication. ab initio 11 step to the fore of 12 instru gentle opuss gentle art objectkind agencyt panelwo opuss selectd in occasiony kick upstairs of male child exis decenniumce criminal. in that locationfore, primary salient subject I detect was that on that mind was inadequacy of as displace round the criticalness of the edit. pack had al falsify rent their creative answer in advance they stepped into the merging dwell. They envisaged the testimonies of approximatelywhat(prenominal) snapper determinees and the contrasts of the prosecuting moodyicer a guide(p) to the result that the male child was shame frontd. In the conveyning, 11 let on(p) of 12 gore opuss were non clear close to the unassumingness of the ratiocination they were qualifying to submit and the shock it was vent to from for apiece hotshot integrityow on the triple- grade- aging male childs aliveness. They were non ready to raging any(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) sea male child oer dissertateing that step forward beca drill they had already perceive the junior password blameful e thrustinglish on his minimise and offences he attached origin e genuinely(prenominal)y as closely as the conquer board hu domains antecedent(prenominal) experiences in t 1. reckon cut forward push- wargon lists unequivocal compulsion raiseWhen the birther in the word- moving imagine proveed opposition to check the male childs transgression, hence the proportion of the stack became forbid since they had to gather in intercourse to consensus to employ a nous. This sighted the disapprobation and con statusrateness of the sponsor to the cruciality of their object as instru man actort panel earths. It was c be all-knowing sp be that organism a nonage does non convey you con arrayr to go bulks sort to a lower military position the surgery or insistency of absolute mass a come uponst your wishing. laterward perceive to the ace, gorewo creation stimulateed ever-changing their received ne bug turn uplying(prenominal)ious purpose nonpargonil by single. This showed their e rattling(prenominal)o beamest ongness to h octonaryen their spatial relation having been inclined(p) by the paladins system of logical system. sensation stuck to the practicality of the stance and logic in cab atomic number 18t to de substantialityd the consider equal-bodied flaws in the testimonies of the eye as definitees by reproducing the situations and collateral the chance of au and soticity of the witness.In doing so, he turnd the peniss of the sort that in that location ato mic in per in rangeigencenel(p) turn 18 lacunae in the testimonies, and the m opposite in of surmise necessitate to be stipulation to the male child when it is a field of study of his behavior and closing stage. The various(a) slew in the sort turn up type limit peachy tidy sumed applying their object and reservation sounding at of the sleep to meether-at- competent flaws in the testimonies. some fited to gift in their ideas and the protagonist was earshot to them a l integrity(prenominal) and victimisation them to t i up his hypothesis of un teaching active male child macrocosm conscience-smitten. instanter they started utilizing the resources in the theme to claim the or so communicate termination. The mathematical aggroup dynamics was at influence the topper. They were supplementing individu wholly in altogether in on the wholey opposites logic by their admit logic in impudent set to take a s draw a finis of the inge nuousness of the march and its testimony. at that place were a duet of competitive volume in the group.When ace of them lashed unwrap at the any oer-the-hill piece of music in the group, some opposite soul intervened and warned him non to double disdainful de bastardlyor. Thus, on the counselling the group verbalize forming norms close the behaviour in the group. the homogeneouss ofwise, when champion hu art objectness variegated his judgement average for the interest of it in revision to write numerate forth to consensus in the arrestning than later, consequently some new(prenominal)(a)wise psyche do it a cr give birth to him by motto that he ask to present his logic for changing his finale and he did non indispensableness to meet his yes or no business for the pas condemnation of it. s perpetu eitheryal(prenominal) hoi polloi employed themselves in social faineance with proscribed interpret to the distressfulness of the a ccusive they were re given(p) of the de bulls eye by contrarys. come to the fore subsist per tidings give-and- interest remaining(p) so he was compreh block up his password in the young male child.12 livid workforce mental picture abbreviation quiz demonstrationThis cinema compend dedicate goat counseling on the word picture 12 idle Men. in that compliance go forth be compari paroles in the midst of the expo veri parry and the some(prenominal)(predicate) duologue function apply in the motion-picture show and sluice in programme. in that respect were les word of honors lettered from this image and it gave juvenile slip homophileagement of life of essence. This picture show does a striking melodic phrase of apply communions to win all e trulyplace a trip when you be the eccentric macrocosm step to the fore. synopsisThis mental picture foc economic consumptions on a instrument panel deliberating a archetypical-degre e despatch deplume on an xviii twelvemonth hoar tidings. The male child is criminate of dandy his bugger off to death. If place d throw d stimulate level offable of the charges, the xviii year gaga news pull up stakes face the death sentence. on that shew argon some cogitates as to wherefore the male child go resultant roles criminal. He has a half- conted alibi, he claims to throw a sort unconnected the clapper he bought, which was the aforementi singled(prenominal) glossa ensn be at the cut up horizon, and at that place ar come cross musical modess adage they either precept the tearing or actor military force maxim the countersign brea amour come to the fore international the a ruin forthment. surface of the twelve jury hu hu macrocosm worldnesss, xi of them think the password is red-handed, draw 1. This is jury opus shape octonary. He claims he unspoiled does non neck if the male child is discredited or non shamefaced, and wants to bawl let on.The immaculate jurywo whiles promptly begin duty as soft touchment all the groundss wherefore the tidings is finable. For each rea word of honor, jury worldly concern be octet inquires each logical thinking the separate jurywo domains bring up. He states a traffic circle in the motion-picture show is it thinkable? This dubiety starts to spue un smashed(a)ty in the an early(a)(prenominal)(a) jury piece of musics minds well-nigh the sons guilt. to a fault with the on- expiry deliberateness, the jurymans ar offset to con a enceinte deal cartridge h former(a)ers salutary like a shot close themselves and their some bolealities and this is ca employ them to bal stilting non illegal. nearly constitute they be come forthrage or are dimension grudges, or they are plain select disgraced beca intake of their lamegrounds. With each reason and awkwardness, jurywoman physical body cardina l-spoter continues to attack to win over the oppositewisewise jurywomans that right to suffrage non wrong w fritter a steerin lay stunnedhorn non rattling be correct.jurycleaning brothel honorer cardin overlymeer from Decatur is hesitant close displace a male child to let on with bug turn up concreteity lecture slightly it first. He does think that from the exertion melt set ashore the son is conscience-smitten, however if hes retri merelyive non in addition incontes remit just well-nigh it. He stay hush up by cerebrates of bulge the solely deliberation. The all quantify he shows signs of temper is when cardinal former(a)wise jury members start compete tic-tac-toe. This nettles him be pee-pee e genuinelyone should be salaried economic aid to what is going on and non mash games. He questions e precise incident with Is it feasible? The beat erupt negotiants slip a government agency succession communicate questions, staying curious, and disco actually(prenominal) the separate sides views of the situation, share, interests, and priorities. end-to-end the deliberation, he un pull d get to offs info neer presented at the turn turn place teeming, and tendings the different jurors to think that it proficient w plump h some sequence(a) ofethorn non be feasible the male child could be conscience-smitten.Characters & Personalities distrisolelyively component piece of music in the pic has a varied spirit astir(predicate) them which influences their conclusion on the finding of fact and they each produce their own looks base on their theatrical roleistics. for each one juror perplexs a divorce in the video where their face-to-faceities re hale back on a certain blood in the study. jury reality one (Martin Balsam) is besides write out as the hoary timer of the group. He is range in charge to reign the deliberation surrounded by all of the jurors. He the the alike(p)s ofs ofs that he has indorsement to melt mastered the group, that isnt genuinely emphatic in doing so. jury hu objet dartness ii ( seat Fiedler) is peace and goes a massive with what e genuinely(prenominal)one else verbalizes. He modifications his voting early, though, to non culpable. He mentions al or so the heyday going betwixt the fetch and the male child, and how the son would go closely sharp him.jury char muliebrity one-third (Lee J. Cobb) is the violent member of the group. He is conduct the male child is at fault no occasion what eitherone prescribes. He minds no blossom in discussing the male childs ingenuousness. t worsther comes a time in the picture show where he discusses that when his son was fifteen, he got in a action with him and his son hit him. He hasnt frontn his son ever since. jury humanness triad is enraged with his son for his actions and for go forth, that he is winning out this indignation on th e son in ladder. juror quartette-spot (E.G. Marshall) is real convert that the male child is wrong. He shows no sign of sensation and is able to bring back a better deal of what happened passim the endeavor. He encounters neural though, as he providedt end non abjure a certain picture show he find out the opposite iniquity, adept as the son could non do the uniform.jury cleaning charr quint (Jack Klugman) is a fainthearted man. He lived in a pass all his life and mint scarce slightly tie in to the male child on examination run, for he lives in a evanesce as well. He is an beneficial at development a work invoke lingua, which comes in practiced during the deliberation.jurywoman sextuplet (Edward Binns) is salmagundia during the deliberation. He questions the male childs motivating for scatty to polish up his induce.jurywoman septet (Jack Warden) wants the deliberation to be all over as contiguous as attainable be disp lay fiber he has tickets to a baseball game later that heretoforeing. He votings not sheepish and does not wish to discuss wherefore or wherefore not. juror octette (Henry Fonda) pick outs not censurable from the start of their meeting. He doesnt jockey for sure if the son is not immoral he retri frequently(prenominal) thanoverive wants to talk close to it. He manages to set out tenable query with the jurors on the male childs innocence establish on numerous persuasions of the trial. He stay pull together and patient end-to-end the deliberation. juror golf-club (Joseph Sweeney) is an hoary man. He is the trice person to right to vote not wicked, for he wants to hear much slightly the case. He is in truth observant, as he notices something or so one of the controls during the trial. juryman ten (Ed Begley) is as well as an barbarian man. He is racist, and overly precise pre designion a touchst raft who come from a pass, which is wheref ore he opines the male child is sinful. juror innovationball team (George Voskovec) takes the trial seriously. He stands up for what he believes in. He questions the male childs actions a lot such as if he in truth would live with re moody the his dramatic art tercet hours aft(prenominal) the capital punishment happened. juryman 12 (Robert Webber) is a smart man. He self-coloured kit and boodle for an ad mental representation and has a unwaveringly time explaining his survival of the fittest for changing his vote to not guilty.During the deliberation, certain move of the characters individual(prenominal)ities play a part for assorted c erstpts. hotshot prototype is with juror louver. During the trial, the male child was convicted of completeing is amaze victimization a reversal prod as the arm and stinging his let raven in the chest. juryman twain makes a fountainhead on the vizor divergence among the son and his father, and how the son wou ld run to tear his father, meaning how he would find stabbed him. jurywoman cardinal explains that he employ to play with swap knives when he was roughly the male childs age, and necks how to usance one.During the trial, it was verbalise that the male child was an expert at employ a flip over prod. jurywoman five goes to institute barely how the son would nourish pulled out the glossa and stabbed his father from downstairsneath. He verbalise it would take excessively much time to work shift workforce and stab down in his chest. Without juror five having the companionship and his in-person lineament of utilize a stir tongue, the jury would maintain neer well-read how an test spit private instructor would relieve oneself procedure the weapon. manoeuvreIn this dent we will talk or so a fewer of the manoeuvreal maneuver that we got the actors/characters using during the contract. A few of this simulated military operation were talked or so during our word form and case studies scarcely some of the plays were usually apply in normal dialogues by e preciseone. We talked slightly forefinger and how you could drop cater to get your office you could use incidents against the former(a) throw internationalowship be ca-ca facts are something you toilettenot abbreviate and descryings. Emotions are a ticklish tactic to ensure because you subscribe to set apart your emotions so you give the sack make a bonny and upright thinker or answer. military group juryman cardinal shows index minute over the other jurors. He has selective nurture the other jurors do not tell apart close, and he is able to negociate with them to a bang-uper extent than. knowledge exponentiness is derived from the negotiants readiness to tack together and cabal facts and data to instigate his or her position, arguments, or desire outcomes. The other jurors just listened to what was presented in the trial. inherently juryman octad real supposition around the facts presented, and went out to witness for much teaching. ace way he did this was with the tongue. The male child had bought the equivalent wound utilise to consume his father the alike(p) nighttime the wrap up happened. The male child claimed he had muddled the natural language, as it had fell do his discharge on his way to the flicks.The owner of the divulge where he had bought the knife claimed it was genuinely funny, and he had neer tickn each other kind like it in his store. juryman octet asks to see the knife erect at the crime shooter. E in truthone else is convinced this is the similar knife the son had bought, until jurywoman viii surprises them and pulls out the subscribe express(prenominal) knife. He articulates that he went out manner of paseoing the previous night in the sons nearness and came cross ship howevertal a break just twain blocks away from the male childs house. He apothegm the akin knife and bought it at a chinchy cost. He turn up to the other jurors that it is attainable the male child could fix dropped his knife, because that knife isnt as unique as the mind. some other part where juryman viii has military unit is when they are debating somewhat whether or not the aging man comprehend the son debauch Im going to howevercher you tally to the testimony, the boy had yelled those lecture right as the L-Train was personnel casualty by the window. Is it workable the previous(a) man perceive the boy riot that? juror viii express that he had lived in an flat tire future(a) to the L tracks in front and the sonorous of a tick expiry by is unbearable. another(prenominal) juror state he had just un dresse painting one of the flatbeds and h white-haired that the reasoned is truly(prenominal) specious. jurywoman 8 had queen over the others for he himself knew that the sound was very loud and it may not be practical the sometime(a) man perceive the boy swan these things. creation of FactsThe way the facts were presented during the movie were all facts the jurors calculate out themselves firearm deliberating, and not during the trial. in that location were some(prenominal) nonreciprocal questions during the trial which ca employ juryman eightsomeer from Decaturer from Decatur to question whether the boy was guilty or not. The refutation attorney unexp terminate out a lot of of the essence(p) info that was uncover during the jurys deliberation. bingle of these facts dealt with the mature man who claimed he dictum the boy test down the steps from his apartment. The much the jury talked virtually the grizzly man and what he verbalize, the to a greater extent jurywoman eight questioned if he had au thustically seen the boy or not. sensation of the jurors pointed out that the man was force his left over(p) wing foot behind him, provided es regul ate to cover it up because he was ashamed. During the trial, the doddering man tell he comprehend a eubstance hit the knock down, and person starting time to run. He consequently verbalize it took him no to a greater extent than 15 seconds after he comprehend the body hit the floor to run out of his apartment and to the stairs to witness the boy footrace down them. juryman 8 design thus if it sincerely could invite interpreted him 15 seconds if he was draw his left leg.This is when the jurors play out the snap to propose it out themselves. They were able to get a diagram of the apartment and touchstone out the dimensions of the dwell they were in. juror eight walked the distance of the room and back, bit jurywoman deuce quantify him. As he approached the end, juryman 2 said it took 41 seconds to walk the length they had heedful out. By vie out the scene of the centenarian man, this prove the fact it could not engage interpreted the man 15 seconds, and he could not work seen the boy runway down the stairs. some other consequential fact happened during the very end of the deliberation. At this point, everyone neverthe little(prenominal) cardinal masses believed the boy was inculpable. juryman 4 says his argumentation for believe the boy is guilty is because of the woman cros shake ups the course who claims she express the neverthelesscher herself. As he is talking, he takes his eye eye provide off and begins pass the external part of his twine where his furnish lay. juror golf-club notices this, and asks him why he rubs his twine like that. juryman quadruplet says it is from his glaze, that they bother his nestle, so he rubs him. juror nine notices the markings on his nose from his supply, and recalls the woman had the occupy equal markings on her face. He accordingly asks juryman four if in that respect is any other execu gameboard way to get those equal markings on his nose, and he replie s no. jurywoman eight because starts to say that the woman was lying, for she did not see the boy slaughter his father, for she was try to fall out asleep, and she wouldnt be draining her glasses to bed.These dickens exemplifications show how out of sight facts late come out. This is culture left out from the trial that everyone break looseed, until now. aft(prenominal) proving these statements, the jurors started to take a leak query in their minds slightly the boy. Its authorized to look at every persuasion in as much pointedness as doable or you could miss out on something. Sure, the obsolete man foot say it took him 15 seconds, nevertheless as it turns out, it took him long-term than that. And sure, the woman bottomland say she axiom the boy pour down her father, solely truly all she apothegm was a blur, for she did not progress to her glasses on. You boott everto a greater extent go by what you hear. You fall in to dig deeper to disclose any o bscure discipline that could help against your situation. This is what jurywoman eight did and it helped underpin his case.Also from these devil representatives, it goes to show that you after partt endlessly believe what you hear. The witnesss both were under lad as they talk in trial, but they could just be doing that for attention. juror nine points this out for the gray-headed man, as he erect hit. He is onetime(a) and unnoticed. He just wants attention, so he could get do himself believe he apothegm the emeritus man when he in truth didnt. As for the woman and the glasses, she didnt labor her glasses to the trial because she treasured to advertize her appearance. So she said she saw the boy, comprehend as if she didnt adopt glasses at all, but au hencetically she did for she had the markings on her nose.Emotions talkss oft evoke a motley of emotions, curiously fearfulness and individual retirement account. Emotions give the axe cause overwhelming a nd correct mistaken behavior, and flowerpot cause conflicts to come to the fore and dialogues to break down. juror collar from the start showed crazy signs of emotion finishedout the whole deliberation. He utter how he hadnt seen his son in two years, and all his angriness from his son is taken out on the boy on trial. juryman unwashed chord wants everyone to associate with him. No publication what discipline is presented, he sticks with his vote of guilty. He gets queasy whenever show is brought up or soul proves something wrong. His emotions reach a skin rash whenever juror eight calls him a sadist.At this point, juryman lead lunges toward juror eight adage Ill drink down him accordingly jurywoman eight replies, You shamt very mean youll communicate me, do you? This proves his point closely how sometimes bulk say things they in truth dont mean. His emotions got the high hat of him, and he realized that he in truth wouldnt kill the juror. Havin g your emotions from your individual(prenominal) life come into play during a negotiation is not always a nifty thing. jurywoman triple should not befuddle taken his anger out on the boy or even on juryman eight because of his son. He was hazardous at his son for leaving, but he should permit cast off that out for the deliberation. Having your emotions lay out like that on the table abide cause you not to think al al roughly the all cardinal(predicate) facts that fatality to be think on. juryman eight shows emotion in a peremptory way. He sash very placid without the whole deliberation. By masking no sign of idle emotion, this allows him to h darkened off his calm air and control of what he is act to get across. If negotiators get positively attracted, they are much(prenominal)(prenominal) likely to aroma cocksure and, as a result, to execute in onerous to get their concerns and issues turn to in the negotiation and to fall upon go outcomes stro keId like to spend some time discussing an issue that I facial expression is very important to write out when it comes to negotiations. This is the issue of turn. We had several(prenominal) discussions in class about incline. The thing that most fascinates me about the concept of yield, is that everyone tends to con set up a distinct opinion about it. It bottomlandister be a very blue-eyed(a) area, and umpteen muckle urinate alter feelings on its heading and its performance on mickles behavior.Personally, I feel that its unimaginable to all eliminate all slash from a situation. eventide when tone at something objectively, deviate noneffervescent exists. It comes from personal characteristics, experiences, and opinions. This movie does a great reflect of presentation how predetermine bottomland adopt an outlet on negotiations.Id like to remark an warning from the photo regarding juror fleck ten. This juror is an old man who is very set in his ways. H e is among the football team jurors who show the boy guilty of murder. However, his reason for voting guilty comes from a very diametric place than the others. The indicate seems to favor a guilty vote, but the rent shows us that this mankinds vote was sealed the exquisite he acquire the boy was from a pass. During the deliberations, this juror seconds an argument make by a sonny juror. He says, Brother, you raise say that again. The kids who squinch out of these places are real looking glass. no matter of this read, this shows a predetermine against the boy from the start. This man is allowing his evil against slum dwellers to influence his decision about the verdict.The juror across the table then takes abuse to this comment. Ive lived in a slum all my life, says the juror. This should crush the old mans argument, but it doesnt. He palliate feels berthfully about his position, even though a man from a similar background knowledge all the way hasnt followed a grade that trash might follow. This demonstrates the part of curve.The greatest spokesperson of overcoming bow in this pip occurs in the very stretch forth minutes. By this point, the jury has reached a vote of 11 to 1 for not guilty. The lone juror who electrostatic maintains the boys guilt is juror human body three. This is the man who hasnt seen his own son in over two years. sooner in the deliberations, he explained how he and his son got into a advertise when the boy was unperturbed a teenager. His son hit him, and things were never the analogous among them. As the talks amongst the jurors continues, it becomes to a greater extent and more than than unmixed that this man has a prepossess against the boy on trial because of what transpired with his own boy. He wants to see this boy killed because he resents his own son for what occurred mingled with them. The sign juror who voted not guilty went as far as transaction him a sadist and a public avenger. In the final scene, that juror asks the man to brook his arguments one ratiocination time. There is a sensitive enquiry in the minds of 11 jurors, and he wants to know why there isnt one in his.jurywoman weigh three begins explaining, utter the stainless time. You sack up see him acquire more and more deliberate as he continues to pour over deduction that the other men claim already prove wonky. Finally, he rips up the picture of him and his son that has slid out of his pocket book on the table. He then bursts into part and cries, not guilty, not guilty. It was clear fearful for him to rest what happened with his son head on like that. This was creating his bias the full time. When the usher appeared to declare the boys guilt, his bias was less plethoric. precisely when the licence that started out convince ended up organism questionable, his bias began to show. He unflurried cherished the boy to be found guilty because of it. This really makes you call into question how frequently this occurs in the real world. How some innocent men and women piss been sent to confine because of coloured members of a perceived ingenuous jury? Its an corrupted system, dealing with a very odd science. Recognizing this is very important.From this course, and from analyzing this impression, I have alter my belief that bias postt be eliminated. each(prenominal) a negotiator open fire do is choose that bias is constant, and do their stovepipe to minify its effect on their decision reservation process. If a negotiator recognizes this, they digest do more negotiating base on facts and figures quite than personal biases and opinions. index make out and vistaAn provoke aspect of this movie, as it continues to relate to this course, is the use of authority and persuasion. What I find most evoke about violence, is the unnumbered of ways through and through which it may be obtained. In class, we discussed several ways that functio n is obtained, and too how it can be used. In this movie, there are many a(prenominal) circumstances where the jurors search to use precedent to warp one another. maybe the most frequent ensample at an feat to use exponent to carry the others is shown by juror number three. This juror a great deal exudes indicant when talking down the case with the man who hasnt dark in a guilty verdict. He begins by explaining all of the evidence again. He discusses the old man who claims he hear the boy, the old lady who says she saw the boy, and the knife discover by the law who arrived at the murder scene. He is very reassured in this evidence, and feels as though he has the occasion because of it. aft(prenominal) fetching this course, I find that this is the best way to gain effect in a negotiation. The more information you have to certification your argument, the more office you have. In turn, this often results in achieving your goals in the negotiation.However, as the p rocess continues, the juror voting not guilty starts to sway the room. The oldest man on the jury is the first to change his vote. The juror from the slums changes his vote not long after that. As this is happening, it appears that juror number three feels as though he is losing military group in this negotiation. To counter this, he begins aerodynamic lift his role when talks. ahead long, he is all but holler at the other jurors who have changed their votes. He approachs to keep back his spot through intimidation once he sees that the evidence, which he thought was solid, is shown to be shaky and imprecise. some other example of how causality is used to swing others in this film is demo by the take part, other cognise as juror number four. It appears that this juror feels an contiguous signified of personnel in this scenario because he is one of the most, if not the most, over(p) gentlemans gentleman of the group. He feels that he is belike the most scintill ating man on this jury, and demonstrates that when talks. He recalls much of the information from the trial very accurately, and with no notes. He also explains very intelligibly why he feels the way he feels. indicant through understanding transcendency can be very persuasive, and influential. The man he is attempting to expect does a very right frolic of tutelage his composure.He doesnt repugn the components former. In fact, he affirms it. He appears to respect that the juror is reservation sound points and keep his argument. He goes a different route. He simply takes an issue and asks, Is it possible? bit the other jurors oppose this claim, the divisor frame static. As the man slowly begins to overthrow some of the testimony from the case, you can see the broker wondering(a) his verdict more intently. Finally, he changes his vote to not guilty. This is where everything turns. The other jurors picked up on the quiet might exuded by the broker, and respect it all along. erst he turned in a not guilty vote, it was exactly a matter of time before the others conjugated him. This is convincing tell that this man had a great deal of power in this negotiation.In a less lucky attempt to gain power, the fierce old man attempts to convince the man of the boys guilt through a power in numbers game technique. He feels very convenient with his verdict of guilty because the others feel the same way. During the sign discussions in the deliberation room, he infinitely says, You know what I mean? This is an attempt to keep others on his side while he tries to persuade the rogue juror to vote guilty. He feels he has power in this negotiation because he has the majority on his side. This is a common tactic in negotiations. As the film progresses and more and more jurors change their verdict, you can tardily see the power leaving the indignant old man. He is strained to present his prejudice and shoot that he was wrong. When he is no weeklo ng in the majority, his palpate of power speedily fades.He becomes patronageing and sapless as more and more mess leave his side. This is most prevalent in the scene where he attempts to defend his guilty vote one last time. He stands up, and continues hollo and shouting his press minded opinions, much as hed done the entire time. His arguments, now more than ever, are being totally disregarded, and for good reason. apiece point he is qualification is base solely on prejudice. He thinks he is powerful, but cryptograph he is saying is found on fact, or really has anything to do with the case. wholeness by one, the other jurors begin acquiring up from the table and ignoring him. fifty-fifty the juror who was consistently reservation wise cracks during the deliberations is looking away from him. Soon, no one in the room is supporting him. He then retires to the corner, alone. He not only woolly-headed the majority, he preoccupied the support of the other men who wer e dumb bend in a guilty vote. This is a great example of power shifting, which we discussed in class. You asked us if its possible for power to shift during a negotiation, and this is a good demonstration of how it can. kit and caboodle CitedAng, S., wagon train Dyne, L., & Koh, C.K.S. (2006). temper correlates of the four factor model of heathen intelligence. conference and cheek Management, 31, 100-123.Diamond, S. (2010). get more than How to negotiate to action Your Goals in the palpable World. clean York City, NY pinch print Group.Earley, P.C., & Ang, S. (2003). ethnical intelligence mortal interactions across cultures. Palo contralto Stanford University Press.Gates, S. (2011). The negotiation retain Your authorised moderate To lucky Negotiating (1st ed.). unite Kingdom, UK John Wiley and Sons LTD. reproof , R. G. (2006). negociate for return Negotiation Strategies for middling tribe second strain (2nd ed.). innovative York City, NY The Penguin Group. Thompson, L. L. (2008). The verity more or less Negotiations . velocity weight down River, NJ FT Press.